Loading...
Loading...

The riskiest moment in a project is the one before signing: you choose the site, review the numbers on instinct, then commit. After that, the cost is sunk and hard to reverse. The check puts in front of you what supports the decision, what threatens it and what still needs verification, before that moment.
It is the part you need before you commit: market, location, competitors, risks and break-even assumptions. We do not write a hundred-page binder but a decision file that shows what supports the project, what threatens it and what still needs verifying. If a bank or funder requires a specific format, we discuss it with you.
It depends on the activity and the number of candidate areas. We agree the timeline in writing, together with the scope and cost, before any work starts.
Official and public sources dated to the analysis: population statistics, commercial records, maps and points of interest, public reviews and published rental listings. We cite the source and date in the file.
No. The check is decision support, not a guarantee of outcome. We lay out the evidence for and against and what remains an assumption; the decision is yours.
Yes, and it is one of the most common cases we serve. The check is done remotely, the result is reviewed with you online, and once the decision is clear we move to the formation path if you wish.
How supply and demand look in your activity and target area, based on the indicators available at the analysis date.
Who operates in the same activity, where they cluster, and how dense the competition is in the areas you are considering.
What competitors' customers say publicly and what keeps coming up in their complaints, so you build your edge on a testable initial gap.
Candidate areas based on competition density and surrounding activity, with publicly listed rental offers at the analysis date and the sample size.
What threatens the idea, what we do not know yet, and what needs more data before a judgement.
A preliminary call with the evidence for and against, based on the data available at the analysis date and reviewed by our consultant.
A specific list of what to test in the field before signing any commitment: the location, the property, the legal requirements, and the demand assumptions.
You receive the check as a written report, followed by a session with our consultant who explains the recommendation and the reasoning behind it, not a PDF alone.
| Traditional Feasibility Study | Decision Check |
|---|---|
| Written for | |
| The financier | You |
| Length | |
| Hundreds of pages | Enough to decide |
| Data | |
| Desk research, possibly outdated | Public and official sources, dated at the analysis date |
| The question it answers | |
| Does the project qualify for financing? | Do I proceed? Where? What do I verify first? |
| When circumstances change | |
| The document is finished | Re-run with the new data |
| Candour | |
| Leans optimistic | Says "no" when needed |
Tells you whether to proceed, adjust, verify, or postpone.
Financial scenarios we build with you, on your assumptions.
Handled by our team through Sanad. We prepare the file, follow it up, and hand you the requirements; approval is the competent authority's decision.
Analysing your business and your competitors through reviews.
For specialised engineering work, we refer you to a qualified partner.
Your idea and information are never shared or published.
Every figure in your check has a source and an analysis date, so you can ask "from where?" and get an answer.
Our consultant reviews every check before delivery and explains it to you in a session.
The check is a decision-support tool and does not constitute a guarantee of future financial or commercial results.
From the data of your site and competitors as published at the analysis date, not general assumptions.
The initial reading within 3 business days; the financial scenarios with your assumptions on a timeline agreed in writing.
The advice is candid: proceed, adjust, verify, or wait, even if it isn’t what you hoped to hear.
Start with a calm check of your decision: what supports it, what threatens it, and what to verify before you commit.